SWMM5 - Stormwater Management Model

SWMM 5, Watersheds, Water Quality,Hydrology, Hydraulics - Watersheds

Global average radiative forcing estimates and...

Image via Wikipedia

Climate Experts Warn That Short-Term Snapshots Of Temperature Data Can Be Misleading: Focus Instead On The Bigger Picture



ScienceDaily (May 5, 2009) — In the hotly debated arena of global climate change, using short-term trends that show little temperature change or even slight cooling to refute global warming is misleading, write two climate experts in a
paper recently published by the American Geophysical Union — especially
as the long-term pattern clearly shows human activities are causing the
earth’s climate to heat up.



In their paper “Is the climate warming or cooling?” David R. Easterling of the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration’s National Climatic Data Center and Michael Wehner of the Computational Research Division at the Department of Energy’s (DOE)
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory note that a number of
publications, websites and blogs often cite decade-long climate trends,
such as that from 1998-2008, in which the earth’s average temperature
actually dropped slightly, as evidence that the global climate is
actually cooling.



However, Easterling and Wehner write, the reality of the climate system is that, due to natural climate variability, it is entirely possible, even likely, to have a period as long as a decade or two of “cooling” superimposed on the longer-term warming trend. The problem
with citing such short-term cooling trends is that it can mislead
decision-makers into thinking that climate change does not warrant
immediate action. The article was published April 25 in Geophysical Research Letters.

“We wrote this paper, which was carefully reviewed by other researchers and is scientifically defensible, to clearly show that even though our climate is getting warmer, we can’t expect it to do so in a monotonic way – or that each year will be warmer than the preceding
year,” said Wehner. “Even with the climate changes caused by human
activity, we will continue to see natural variability including periods
of cooler temperatures despite the fact that globally averaged
temperatures show long-term global warming.”

“It is easy to ‘cherry pick’ a period to reinforce a point of view, but this notion begs the question, what would happen to the current concerns about climate change if we do have a sustained period where the climate appears to be cooling even when, in the end, the longer
term trend is warming?” write Easterling and Wehner.

The research was funded by the DOE Office of Science’s Office of Biological and Environmental Research through its Climate Change Prediction Program.

Citing an accepted climate modeling scenario in which no efforts are made to reduce the amount of greenhouse gases released into the atmosphere, the earth’s climate is expected to warm by 4 degrees Celsius (7.2 degrees Fahrenheit) by the end of the 21st century. The
authors point out that this is consistent with other simulations
contained in the Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) of the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC 2007), which was
recognized with the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize.

“Climate scientists pay little attention to these short-term fluctuations as the short term ‘cooling trends’…are statistically insignificant and fitting trends to such short periods is not very meaningful in the context of long-term climate change,” the authors
write. “On the other hand, segments of the general public do pay
attention to these fluctuations and some critics cite the most recent
period as evidence against anthropogenic-forced (human-induced) climate
change.”

The authors used both observed climate data from 1901-2008 and a series of climate model simulations performed on supercomputers to study the occurrence of decade-long trends in globally averaged surface air temperature. They found that it is possible, and indeed likely, to
see periods as long as a decade in the recent past which do not show a
warming trend. The authors even found that running computer simulations
for the 21st century with significant increases in greenhouse gas
emissions showed some decades with lower or static average temperatures.

One such example can be found by looking at data from 1998 to 2008, which shows no real trend, even though global temperatures remain well above the long-term average. According to the authors, the unusually strong 1997-98 El Niño contributed to unusual warmth in the global
temperature
for 1998, so that without similar dramatic changes, the
following decade does not appear to be warming. A similar
interpretation can be made by looking at the short-term data from
1977-85 or 1981-89, “even though these periods are embedded in the
1975-2008 period showing a substantial overall warming,” Easterling and
Wehner write. In the first example, dropping data from 1998 and looking
at 1999-2008, the researchers found a strong warming trend.



Journal reference:

  1. David R. Easterling, Michael F. Wehner. Is the climate warming or cooling? Geophys. Res. Lett., 2009; 36: L08706 DOI: 10.1029/2009GL037810


Adapted from materials provided by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (2009, May 5). Climate Experts Warn That Short-Term Snapshots Of Temperature Data Can Be Misleading: Focus Instead On The Bigger Picture. ScienceDaily. Retrieved May 5, 2009, from http://www.sciencedaily.com­ /releases/2009/05/090504141047.htm

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Add a SWMM5 Comment

You need to be a member of SWMM5 - Stormwater Management Model to add comments!

Join SWMM5 - Stormwater Management Model

Latest Activity

Robert E Dickinson added a blog post
The skip steady state periods uses the last computed flows in the conveyance system instead of computing new flows. In the sample graphs you can see where the change in lateral flow is below 0.05 cfs (the blue arrow in the second image). The network…
17 hours ago
Cygne is now a member of SWMM5 - Stormwater Management Model
on Thursday
Robert E Dickinson added 3 blog posts
on Wednesday
Hi, Thanks a lot and I will be working on it. Thanks again for your effort. Upaka
on Tuesday
Here is a sample SWMM 5 model for you to look at - it has one TSS pollutant and one loading point - the node 8040
on Tuesday
Yes, you can add a Dry weather flow concentration to a node in SWMM 5. 1st you make a pollutant, then go to a node and add DWF and a pollutant concentration. The load - flow * concentration will go into the network.
on Tuesday
Upaka added a discussion
Hi,Is it possible to add a pollutant concentration (eg. TSS = 20 mg/L) to a node at a network in SWMM? Thanks a lot
on Tuesday
on Tuesday
Upaka is now a member of SWMM5 - Stormwater Management Model
on Tuesday
Robert E Dickinson added a blog post
Saving U.S. Water and Sewer Systems Would Be Costly By CHARLES DUHIGG WASHINGTON — One recent morning, George S. Hawkins, a long-haired environmentalist who now leads one of the largest and most prominent water and sewer systems, trudged to a street…
on Monday
Robert E Dickinson added 2 notes
March 14
Robert E Dickinson added a blog post
If you a lead and lag pump connecting the same upstream and downstream
March 13
H.M.D.Harshani and Marko Jankovič joined SWMM5 - Stormwater Management Model
March 9
March 4
March 4
Robert E Dickinson added 2 blog posts
March 3
QA/QC SWMM 5 Version for SWMM 5.0.013 and SMWM 5.0.018
March 3
Robert E Dickinson added a photo
March 3
March 2, 2010 Version swmm5.dll Epaswmm5.exe
March 2
March 1

© 2010   Created by Robert E Dickinson

Badges  |  Report An Issue | SWMM 5 Blog  |  Privacy  |  Terms of Service