SWMM5 - Stormwater Management Model

SWMM 5, Watersheds, Water Quality,Hydrology, Hydraulics - Watersheds

Robert E Dickinson

Forgotten But Not Gone: How The Brain Re-learns

  • Rating: No Rating
Forgotten But Not Gone: How The Brain Re-learns

ScienceDaily (Nov. 22, 2008) — Thanks to our ability to learn and to remember, we can perform tasks that other living things can not even dream of. However, we are only just beginning to get the gist of what really goes on in the brain when it learns or forgets something. What we do know is that changes in the contacts between nerve cells play an important role. But can these structural changes account for that well-known phenomenon that it is much easier to re-learn something that was forgotten than to learn something completely new?

Scientists at the Max Planck Institute of Neurobiology have been able to show that new cell contacts established during a learning process stay put, even when they are no longer required. The reactivation of this temporarily inactivated "stock of contacts" enables a faster learning of things forgotten.
While an insect still flings itself against the window-pane after dozens of unsuccessful attempts to gain its freedom, our brain is able to learn very complex associations and sequences of movement. This not only helps us to avoid accidents like walking into glass doors, but also enables us to acquire such diverse skills as riding a bicycle, skiing, speaking different languages or playing an instrument. Although a young brain learns more easily, we retain our ability to learn up to an advanced age. For a long time, scientists have been trying to ascertain exactly what happens in the brain while we learn or forget.

Flexible connections

To learn something, in other words, to successfully process new information, nerve cells make new connections with each other. When faced with an unprecedented piece of information, for which no processing pathway yet exists, filigree appendages begin to grow from the activated nerve cell towards its neighbours. Whenever a special point of contact, called synapse, forms at the end of the appendage, information can be transferred from one cell to the next - and new information is learned. Once the contact breaks down, we forget what we have learned.

The subtle difference between learning and relearning

Although learning and memory were recently shown to be linked to the changes in brain structure mentioned above, many questions still remain unanswered. What happens, for example, when the brain learns something, forgets it after a while and then has to learn it again later? By way of example, we know from experience that, once we have learned to ride a bicycle, we can easily pick it up again, even if we haven’t practiced for years. In other cases too, "relearning" tends to be easier than starting "from scratch". Does this subtle difference also have its origins in the structure of the nerve cells?

Cell appendages abide the saying "a bird in the hand …"

Scientists at the Max Planck Institute of Neurobiology have now managed to show that there are indeed considerable differences in the number of new cell contacts made - depending on whether a piece of information is new or is being learned second time around. Nerve cells that process visual information, for instance, produced a considerably higher number of new cell contacts if the flow of information from their "own" eye was temporarily blocked. After approximately five days, the nerve cells had rearranged themselves so as to receive and process information from the other eye - the brain had resigned itself to having only one eye at its disposal. Once information flowed freely again from the eye that had been temporarily closed, the nerve cells resumed their original function and now more or less ignored signals from the alternative eye.
"What surprised us most, however, was that the majority of the appendages which developed in response to the information blockade, continued to exist, despite the fact that the blockade was abolished ", project leader Mark Hübener explains. Everything seems to point to the fact that synapses are only disabled, but not physically removed. "Since an experience that has been made may occur again at a later point in time, the brain apparently opts to save a few appendages for a rainy day", Hübener continues. And true enough, when the same eye was later inactivated again, the nerve cells reorganized themselves much more quickly - because they could make use of the appendages that had stayed in place.

Useful reactivation

Many of the appendages that develop between nerve cells are thus maintained and facilitate later relearning. This insight is crucial to our understanding of the fundamental processes of learning and memory. And so, even after many years of abstinence, it should be no great problem if we want to have a go at skiing again this winter.
Journal reference:
Hofer et al. Experience leaves a lasting structural trace in cortical circuits. Nature, November 12, 2008; DOI: 10.1038/nature07487

Add a SWMM5 Comment

You need to be a member of SWMM5 - Stormwater Management Model to add comments!

Join SWMM5 - Stormwater Management Model

Robert E Dickinson Comment by Robert E Dickinson on December 31, 2008 at 11:50pm
Robert E Dickinson Comment by Robert E Dickinson on December 31, 2008 at 11:30pm

Latest Activity

tian tian and Hussam joined SWMM5 - Stormwater Management Model
2 hours ago
7 hours ago
Robert E Dickinson added a blog post
MWH Soft Releases InfoWorks and FloodWorks Version 11 New Version Available for Industry-Leading Workgroup Management Modeling Software for Wastewater, Stormwater, Drinking Water, and River Systems Broomfield, Colorado USA, September 8, 2010 MWH Sof…
17 hours ago
mohammed A Alim is now a member of SWMM5 - Stormwater Management Model
yesterday
Robert E Dickinson added a blog post
Creating Clearer Climate Computer Codes by Eli Kintisch on 3 September 2010, 12:01 PM | Permanent Link | 2 Comments EmailPrint|More PREVIOUS ARTICLE NEXT ARTICLE British software engineers Nick Barnes and David Jones have spent the past 3 years t…
on Sunday
Robert E Dickinson just checked out the RSS pages...
(via RSS Pages)
on Friday
August 31
Antony Manoharan is now a member of SWMM5 - Stormwater Management Model
August 31
Robert E Dickinson added a blog post
MWH Soft Releases InfoSewer Version 6.0 for ArcGIS 10 New Version of the Leading Wastewater Modeling and Management Package Leverages Newest Esri Software Broomfield, Colorado USA, August 31, 2010 — MWH Soft, a leading global innovator of wet in…
August 31
------------------------ Build 5.0.020 (08/23/10) ------------------------ Engine Updates 1. A refactoring bug that prevented SWMM from reading rainfall data from external rainfall files was fixed. See gage.c.
August 23
lia almila and Dr. MVRL Murthy joined SWMM5 - Stormwater Management Model
August 22
There are 152 members on SWMM5 - Stormwater Management Model
August 19
SWMM5 - Stormwater Management Model now has leaderboards
August 19
August 17
David Jones is now a member of SWMM5 - Stormwater Management Model
August 17
Robert E Dickinson added a blog post
From the NYT In Weather Chaos, a Case for Global Warming The collective answer of the scientific community can be boiled down to a single word: probably. “The climate is changing,” said Jay Lawrimore, chief of climate analysis at the National Clima…
August 17
You should still adjust the width individually for each subcatchment but compare the peak flows for the combined flows to your monitored data. Unless you want to model S1, S2 and S3 together then you are best off estimating the width for each subcat…
August 15
Thank you for your help. However, the flow measurement was only taken at the outlet of the whole catchment (Out 1). if i want to calibrate the runoff quantity, how can i obtain the width of the whole catchment? Am i combine the total width of subcat…
August 15
Originally, when SWMM was developed the width parameter was the collection length of the subcatchment. For example, it would be the gutter length on a street going to an inlet. In your case one easy way to estimate the Width for the subcatchment goi…
August 14
Chow Ming Fai added a blog post
Hello,I am not familiar on using SWMM for quantity and quality modeling. i need some helps here.I have a problem on calibrating the total width of catchment in SWMM quantity modeling. Figure shown below is my studied catchment. the surface runoff is…
August 14

© 2010   Created by Robert E Dickinson.   Powered by .

Badges  |  Report An Issue | SWMM 5 Blog  |  Terms of Service