SWMM5 - Stormwater Management Model

SWMM 5, Watersheds, Water Quality,Hydrology, Hydraulics - Watersheds

Robert E Dickinson

Can Living And Non-living Follow Same Rules? Unifying The Animate And Inanimate Designs Of Nature

  • Rating: No Rating

Can Living And Non-living Follow Same Rules? Unifying The Animate And Inanimate Designs Of Nature



ScienceDaily (Apr. 30, 2009) — Living beings and inanimate phenomena may have more in common than previously thought.



At least that is the view of Duke University engineer Adrian Bejan and Penn State biologist James Marden.



What they believe connects the two worlds is a theory that flow systems – from animal locomotion to the formation of river deltas -- evolve in time to balance and minimize imperfections. Flows evolve to reduce friction or other forms of resistance, so that they flow more
easily with time. This view has been termed the constructal law, which
Bejan first stated 13 years ago.

With the help of Marden, Bejan believes that he has now unified both the biological and geophysical principles of nature's design through the constructal law, which can also be viewed as the physics of evolution.

"This is an exciting development for physicists, but it should also resonate with biologists," Bejan said. "The idea that organic evolution is analogous to the way form evolves in inanimate flow systems is a novel concept that has the potential to unite perspectives and
approaches across disparate disciplines. We suggest that the
constructal law provides a powerful tool for examining and
understanding variation in both the animate and inanimate compartments
of nature."

The team's findings were published online in the journal Physics of Life Reviews. It was supported by the U.S. Air Force Office of Scientific Research and the National Science Foundation.

The story began with the two scientists trying to determine if the same laws applied to two very different forms of locomotion -- the swimming of fish and the running or flying of animals. The commonly held belief among biologists was that fish locomotion was different
than other animal locomotion. Since they live in water, the
conventional wisdom held, fish were different because they would not be
subject to gravity.

The way Bejan saw it, birds and animals could be seen as weight-lifters, since their means of locomotion required effort with an unyielding base – the ground – and a limitless top – the air. He argued that as fish swim, they too have an unyielding floor – the sea bed.
Hence, water flowed over and around them like the air over runners and
flyers.

So, fish too were weight-lifters, and these forms of locomotion are predicted by the constructal law, Bejan said.

"Our discovery that animal locomotion adheres to the constructal law tells us that – even though you couldn't predict exactly what animals would look like if you started evolution over on Earth, or it happened on another planet – with a given gravity and density of their tissues,
the same basic patterns of their design would evolve again," Marden
said.

In numerous papers over past decade, Bejan has demonstrated that the constructal law predicts the design of a wide range of flow systems seen in nature, from biology and geophysics to social dynamics and technology evolution.

"When thinking of evolution and Darwin, most people think of animals or trees," Bejan said. "That's too bad, because design features are everywhere in nature. The constructal law can be seen as a universal principle of evolution, which applies in many fields, from physics to
economics."

He describes the law as an animated movie, where one screen is replaced by another screen on which the currents flow with greater ease. He sees the constructal law (http://www.constructal.org) as the time direction of the movie, flow configurations (designs, drawings) that flow more easily."

"The constructal law can be seen to cover 'natural design' phenomena across the board," Bejan said, "as a compact summary of common observations, the tape of evolution running in one direction, which may be expressed in physics terms simply as: time and configuration."




Journal reference:

  1. Adrian Bejana, James H. Marden. The constructal unification of biological and geophysical design. Physics of Life Reviews, 2008; DOI: 10.1016/j.plrev.2008.12.002


Adapted from materials provided by Duke University.

Email or share this story:





APA

MLA
Duke University (2009, April 30). Can Living And Non-living Follow Same Rules? Unifying The Animate And Inanimate Designs Of Nature. ScienceDaily. Retrieved April 29, 2009, from http://www.sciencedaily.com­ /releases/2009/04/090428103104.htm

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Add a SWMM5 Comment

You need to be a member of SWMM5 - Stormwater Management Model to add comments!

Join SWMM5 - Stormwater Management Model

Latest Activity

tian tian and Hussam joined SWMM5 - Stormwater Management Model
2 hours ago
7 hours ago
Robert E Dickinson added a blog post
MWH Soft Releases InfoWorks and FloodWorks Version 11 New Version Available for Industry-Leading Workgroup Management Modeling Software for Wastewater, Stormwater, Drinking Water, and River Systems Broomfield, Colorado USA, September 8, 2010 MWH Sof…
17 hours ago
mohammed A Alim is now a member of SWMM5 - Stormwater Management Model
yesterday
Robert E Dickinson added a blog post
Creating Clearer Climate Computer Codes by Eli Kintisch on 3 September 2010, 12:01 PM | Permanent Link | 2 Comments EmailPrint|More PREVIOUS ARTICLE NEXT ARTICLE British software engineers Nick Barnes and David Jones have spent the past 3 years t…
on Sunday
Robert E Dickinson just checked out the RSS pages...
(via RSS Pages)
on Friday
August 31
Antony Manoharan is now a member of SWMM5 - Stormwater Management Model
August 31
Robert E Dickinson added a blog post
MWH Soft Releases InfoSewer Version 6.0 for ArcGIS 10 New Version of the Leading Wastewater Modeling and Management Package Leverages Newest Esri Software Broomfield, Colorado USA, August 31, 2010 — MWH Soft, a leading global innovator of wet in…
August 31
------------------------ Build 5.0.020 (08/23/10) ------------------------ Engine Updates 1. A refactoring bug that prevented SWMM from reading rainfall data from external rainfall files was fixed. See gage.c.
August 23
lia almila and Dr. MVRL Murthy joined SWMM5 - Stormwater Management Model
August 22
There are 152 members on SWMM5 - Stormwater Management Model
August 19
SWMM5 - Stormwater Management Model now has leaderboards
August 19
August 17
David Jones is now a member of SWMM5 - Stormwater Management Model
August 17
Robert E Dickinson added a blog post
From the NYT In Weather Chaos, a Case for Global Warming The collective answer of the scientific community can be boiled down to a single word: probably. “The climate is changing,” said Jay Lawrimore, chief of climate analysis at the National Clima…
August 17
You should still adjust the width individually for each subcatchment but compare the peak flows for the combined flows to your monitored data. Unless you want to model S1, S2 and S3 together then you are best off estimating the width for each subcat…
August 15
Thank you for your help. However, the flow measurement was only taken at the outlet of the whole catchment (Out 1). if i want to calibrate the runoff quantity, how can i obtain the width of the whole catchment? Am i combine the total width of subcat…
August 15
Originally, when SWMM was developed the width parameter was the collection length of the subcatchment. For example, it would be the gutter length on a street going to an inlet. In your case one easy way to estimate the Width for the subcatchment goi…
August 14
Chow Ming Fai added a blog post
Hello,I am not familiar on using SWMM for quantity and quality modeling. i need some helps here.I have a problem on calibrating the total width of catchment in SWMM quantity modeling. Figure shown below is my studied catchment. the surface runoff is…
August 14

© 2010   Created by Robert E Dickinson.   Powered by .

Badges  |  Report An Issue | SWMM 5 Blog  |  Terms of Service