SWMM5 - Stormwater Management Model

SWMM 5, Watersheds, Water Quality,Hydrology, Hydraulics - Watersheds

H2OMAP SWMM and InfoSWMM Sediment Transport Modeling
Sanitary and combined sewer systems can carry substantial loads of suspended solids (waste solids) which can accumulate and cause blockages thereby impairing the hydraulic capacity of the sewer pipes (by restricting their flow area and increasing the bed friction resistance). H2OMAP SWMM and InfoSWMM can simulate the transport and gravitational settling of (total suspended solids including grit) over time throughout the sewer collection system under varying hydraulic conditions. As long as flow velocity exceeds the critical/terminal velocity, H2OMAP SWMM and InfoSWMM assumes that the sewage flow has the capacity to transport all incoming . Deposited particles are also assumed to be scoured and transported downstream when velocity of the sewage flow exceeds the terminal velocity. Settling starts when flow velocity falls below the critical velocity. In the model, transport of thet particles is governed by advection implying that the particles are transported at local flow velocity.

The sediment transport modeling using H2OMAP SWMM and InfoSWMM requires only few inputs, namely limiting flow velocity, particle settling velocity, and source node(s) and initial concentrations (in mg/l) at the source nodes.
In order to specify the first two inputs (i.e., limiting flow velocity and particle settling velocity), the user should first select from the quality tab which in turn activates the editing tabs for particle settling velocity and limiting flow velocity. Specification of source node(s) and its/their initial concentration is similar to the method described above in relation to pollutant transport. The default values used by the model for limiting flow velocity and particle settling velocity are 2 ft/s and 0.1 ft/s, respectively. User specified values over rid these default figures .
H2OMAP SWMM and InfoSWMM deposition (in kg) in pipes and concentration (in mg/l) at manholes, wet wells, and outlets are the outputs reported following successful simulation of transport for a collection system.

Last updated by Robert E Dickinson Sep. 20, 2008.

Latest Activity

tian tian and Hussam joined SWMM5 - Stormwater Management Model
1 hour ago
6 hours ago
Robert E Dickinson added a blog post
MWH Soft Releases InfoWorks and FloodWorks Version 11 New Version Available for Industry-Leading Workgroup Management Modeling Software for Wastewater, Stormwater, Drinking Water, and River Systems Broomfield, Colorado USA, September 8, 2010 MWH Sof…
16 hours ago
mohammed A Alim is now a member of SWMM5 - Stormwater Management Model
yesterday
Robert E Dickinson added a blog post
Creating Clearer Climate Computer Codes by Eli Kintisch on 3 September 2010, 12:01 PM | Permanent Link | 2 Comments EmailPrint|More PREVIOUS ARTICLE NEXT ARTICLE British software engineers Nick Barnes and David Jones have spent the past 3 years t…
on Sunday
Robert E Dickinson just checked out the RSS pages...
(via RSS Pages)
on Friday
August 31
Antony Manoharan is now a member of SWMM5 - Stormwater Management Model
August 31
Robert E Dickinson added a blog post
MWH Soft Releases InfoSewer Version 6.0 for ArcGIS 10 New Version of the Leading Wastewater Modeling and Management Package Leverages Newest Esri Software Broomfield, Colorado USA, August 31, 2010 — MWH Soft, a leading global innovator of wet in…
August 31
------------------------ Build 5.0.020 (08/23/10) ------------------------ Engine Updates 1. A refactoring bug that prevented SWMM from reading rainfall data from external rainfall files was fixed. See gage.c.
August 23
lia almila and Dr. MVRL Murthy joined SWMM5 - Stormwater Management Model
August 22
There are 152 members on SWMM5 - Stormwater Management Model
August 19
SWMM5 - Stormwater Management Model now has leaderboards
August 19
August 17
David Jones is now a member of SWMM5 - Stormwater Management Model
August 17
Robert E Dickinson added a blog post
From the NYT In Weather Chaos, a Case for Global Warming The collective answer of the scientific community can be boiled down to a single word: probably. “The climate is changing,” said Jay Lawrimore, chief of climate analysis at the National Clima…
August 17
You should still adjust the width individually for each subcatchment but compare the peak flows for the combined flows to your monitored data. Unless you want to model S1, S2 and S3 together then you are best off estimating the width for each subcat…
August 15
Thank you for your help. However, the flow measurement was only taken at the outlet of the whole catchment (Out 1). if i want to calibrate the runoff quantity, how can i obtain the width of the whole catchment? Am i combine the total width of subcat…
August 15
Originally, when SWMM was developed the width parameter was the collection length of the subcatchment. For example, it would be the gutter length on a street going to an inlet. In your case one easy way to estimate the Width for the subcatchment goi…
August 14
Chow Ming Fai added a blog post
Hello,I am not familiar on using SWMM for quantity and quality modeling. i need some helps here.I have a problem on calibrating the total width of catchment in SWMM quantity modeling. Figure shown below is my studied catchment. the surface runoff is…
August 14

© 2010   Created by Robert E Dickinson.   Powered by .

Badges  |  Report An Issue | SWMM 5 Blog  |  Terms of Service