SWMM5 - Stormwater Management Model

SWMM 5, Watersheds, Water Quality,Hydrology, Hydraulics - Watersheds

Soil Conservation Service Curve Numbersti

One of the advantages of use of the curve number (CN) method for loss estimates (Section 3.3) is the highly structured method for CN estimates provided by the NRCS (SCS, 1972,1988; McCuen, 1998, Bedient and Huber, 2002 and virtually every hydrology text).  Such estimates are embedded in engineering practice through Table 3-18, in which CN values are given as function of land use and soil Hydrologic Soil Group (A through D).  Hydrologic Soil Group has the meaning indicated in Table 3-17, ranging from well-drained (type A) to poorly drained (type D).  Every soil in the United States has an A-D classification, or sometimes a dual classification, such as B/D, meaning drained (artificially) and undrained (natural) condition. 

 

Table 3-17. Hydrologic soil group meanings (SCS, 1972, Chapter 7).

Group

Meaning

A

Low runoff potential. Soils having high infiltration rates even when thoroughly wetted and consisting chiefly of deep, well to excessively drained sands or gravels.

B

Soils having moderate infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted and consisting chiefly of moderately deep to deep, moderately well to well-drained soils with moderately fine to moderately coarse textures.  E.g., shallow loess, sandy loam.

C

Soils having slow infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted and consisting chiefly of soils with a layer that impedes downward movement of water, or soils with moderately fine to fine textures. E.g., clay loams, shallow sandy loam.

D

High runoff potential.  Soils having very slow infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted and consisting chiefly of clay soils with a high swelling potential, soils with a permanent high water table, soils with a clay-pan or clay layer at or near the surface, and shallow soils over nearly impervious material.

 

            Hydrologic Soil Group is provided on the Soil Survey Interpretation sheets discussed in Section 3.8.8.2.  For instance, the Conestoga Silt Loam of Figure 3-37a is in hydrologic soil group B.  A more concise listing is provided in the Soil Survey for each county, published by the NRCS or the local Soil and Water Conservation District. 

            Hence, parameter estimation for SWMM (and any use of curve numbers) is straightforward and relatively unambiguous.  Curve numbers may also be used to back-calculate estimates of initial moisture deficit, as discussed earlier in conjunction with Equation 3-135, since the CN and storage, S, are related through

 

                                                                                                             (3-136)

 

where it is essential to remember that units of S are in inches.  And early discussion of Horton infiltration parameters has also been related to Hydrologic Soil Group. 


Table 3-18. Runoff curve numbers for selected agricultural, suburban, and urban land use (SCS, 1986).  (Antecedent moisture condition II; Ia = 0.2S)

Hydrologic Soil Group

Land Use Description

A

B

C

D

Cultivated land1

 

 

 

 

Without conservation treatment

72

81

88

91

With conservation treatment

62

71

78

81

Pasture or range land

 

 

 

 

Poor condition

68

79

86

89

Good condition

39

61

74

80

Meadow

 

 

 

 

Good condition

30

58

71

78

Wood or forest land

 

 

 

 

Thin stand, poor cover, no mulch

45

66

77

83

Good cover2

25

55

70

77

Open spaces, lawns, parks, golf courses, cemeteries, etc.

 

 

 

 

Good condition: grass cover on 75% or more of the area

39

61

74

80

Fair condition: grass cover on 50 – 75% of the area

49

69

79

84

Commercial and business areas (85% impervious)

89

92

94

95

Industrial districts (72% impervious)

81

88

91

93

Residential3

 

 

 

 

Average lot size

Average % impervious4

 

 

 

 

1/8 ac or less

65

77

85

90

92

1/4 ac

38

61

75

83

87

1/3 ac

30

57

72

81

86

1/2 ac

25

54

70

80

85

1 ac

20

51

68

79

84

Paved parking lots, roofs, driveways, etc.5

98

98

98

98

Streets and roads

 

 

 

 

Paved with curbs and storm sewers5

98

98

98

98

Gravel

76

85

89

91

Dirt

72

82

87

89

1. For a more detailed description of agricultural land use curve numbers, refer to the SCS (1972) National Engineering Handbook, Section 4, “Hydrology.”

2. Good cover is protected from grazing and litter and brush cover soil.

3. Curve numbers are computed assuming that the runoff from the house and driveway is directed toward the street with a minimum of roof water directed to lawns where additional infiltration could occur.

4. The remaining pervious areas (lawn) are considered to be in good pasture condition for these curve numbers.

5. In some warmer climates of the country a curve number of 95 may be used.

Last updated by Robert E Dickinson Apr. 21, 2008.

Latest Activity

The time step used during the simulation at any one time is the minimum of the link and node time steps. As the example shown below shows usually the link time step (based on the CFL) condition is more restrictive than the node time step. In the ima…
on Wednesday
Xiaoyan Huang is now a member of SWMM5 - Stormwater Management Model
July 22
Robert E Dickinson added a blog post
Shanghai Makes MWH Soft’s InfoWorks WS Solution Its Water Distribution Modeling Platform Largest City in World’s Most Populous Country Looks to Advanced MWH Soft Technologyto Improve Drinking Water Operations and Planning Broomfield, Colorado US…
July 14
July 13
Alan is now a member of SWMM5 - Stormwater Management Model
July 13
Robert E Dickinson added a blog post
From a Stanford University Study as described in Science Daily Seasonal records The Stanford team also forecast a dramatic spike in extreme seasonal temperatures during the current decade. Temperatures equaling the hottest season on record from 19…
July 11
July 11
Reza Imani is now a member of SWMM5 - Stormwater Management Model
July 11
Robert E Dickinson added a blog post
New MWH Soft InfoWater V8 Is First Hydraulic Modeling Software for ArcGIS 10 Eighth Generation Shows Company’s Commitment to ArcGIS Platform Broomfield, Colorado USA, July 7, 2010 — MWH Soft, a leading global innovator of wet infrastructure mode…
July 7
Basil Jamison is now a member of SWMM5 - Stormwater Management Model
July 5
Robert E Dickinson added a page
July 4
Robert E Dickinson added a blog post
Routing Time Step Summary
July 3
Robert E Dickinson added a page
July 3
Robert E Dickinson added a blog post
Explicit Iteration Hydraulic Computation and Implicit Time Step Hydraulic Computations in SWMM 5 The dynamic wave solution in SWMM 5 and InfoSWMM uses an interlocking explicit iteration in an overall time step implicit calculation of the node dep…
July 2
A blog post by Robert E Dickinson was featured
MWH Soft Launches Technical Webinar Series Inaugural Eight-Week Series for Wet Infrastructure Utilities and Consultants Begins July 16 Broomfield, Colorado USA, June 30, 2010 — MWH Soft, a leading global innovator of wet infrastructure modeling…
June 30
Robert E Dickinson added a blog post
MWH Soft Launches Technical Webinar Series Inaugural Eight-Week Series for Wet Infrastructure Utilities and Consultants Begins July 16 Broomfield, Colorado USA, June 30, 2010 — MWH Soft, a leading global innovator of wet infrastructure modeling…
June 30
Joaquim Egea i Martinez is now a member of SWMM5 - Stormwater Management Model
June 24
Robert E Dickinson added a blog post
MWH Soft Unveils Highly Anticipated InfoWorks TS for Comprehensive Hydraulic Transient Analysisof Water Distribution Systems Fourth Quarter 2010 Release to Deliver Unprecedented Transient Modeling Capabilities for Better Decision-Making Broomfiel…
June 16
Aren Matta added a discussion
Hello All   I was wondering if any of you have worked on CSO control alternatives as the city i reside is looking for alternatives assessment.   Some of the alternatives we have are :     Satellite Treatment WWTP's (There has to be more than storage…
June 15
Robert E Dickinson added a blog post
The “Hockey Stick” evolution By andyrussellThis is a post that aims to go through the evolution of the “Hockey Stick” from 1990 to the present day. It naturally misses out parts of the story, which deserve far more analysis, simply to keep the post…
June 15

© 2010   Created by Robert E Dickinson.

Badges  |  Report An Issue | SWMM 5 Blog  |  Terms of Service