SWMM5 - Stormwater Management Model

SWMM 5, Watersheds, Water Quality,Hydrology, Hydraulics - Watersheds

Robert E Dickinson

Runoff Example Files for SWMM 4

  • Rating: 4 after 1 vote
These are 48 Runoff Example Files that I created based on PC-SWMM 3, SWMM 3 and new SWMM 4 features at UF between 1985 and 1981.

These files will work with any SWMM 4 version. If you look at page http://www.swmm2000.com/SWMM4/swmm-3-4-dos-engines

we have a variety of SWMM 3 and SWMM 4 engine.

The File Runoff45.DOC is the text documentation for the SWMM 4 Runoff File.

Link http://www.swmm2000.com/group/swmm4inputfiles

Tags: 4, Example, Files, Runoff, SWMM, for

Attachments:

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Robert E Dickinson Permalink Reply by Robert E Dickinson on January 17, 2010 at 12:20pm
SW 1 0 8 9 8
MM 6 21 20 30 31 32 33
@ 8 'RUNOFF.INT'
# SWMM5_CALIBRATION_FILE
$ANUM
$RUNOFF
A1 'RUNOFF EXAMPLE 1, no CHANNELS, NO groundwater'
A1 'HEAVY RAIN CAUSES WATER TABLE TO REACH SURFACE'
* METRIC ISNOW NRGAG INFILM KWALTY IVAP NHR NMN NDAY MONTH IYRSTR
B1 0 0 1 1 0 1 00 0 1 1 90
B2 0 1 0
* WET WET/DRY DRY LUNIT LONG
B3 900. 1800.0 86400. 2 45.0
D1 0
* KTYPE KINC KPRINT KTHIS KTIME KPREP NHISTO THISTO TZRAIN
E1 1 3 0 0 0 1 6 15.0 0.0
* INPUT DEPTHS OVER THE 15-MIN. TIME STEP. (HEAVY RAIN!)
* TIME RAIN TIME RAIN TIME RAIN
E3 0.0 1.00 30 1.00 60 1.00
E3 90 1.00 120 1.00 150 1.00
*
F1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
*
* JK NAMEW NGTO WIDTH AREA %IMP SLP IMPN PERVN IDS PDS MAX MIN DECAY
*1 0 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.0 0 0 0.0 0. 0.0
H1 1 1 1000 100. 300.0 1. .001 .04 .30 .00 .00 5.0 1.00 .05
*
M1 1 1
M2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
M3 1000
$ENDPROGRAM


* SPECIAL CONTROL SYMBOLS NOW CONTROL THE SWMM INPUT FILE
* THE SPECIAL SYMBOLS ARE '*', '@', AND '$'.
* * ---> COMMENT LINE
* @ ---> SAVE A FILE PERMANENTLY OR USE A SAVED FILE
* $ ---> CALL A SWMM BLOCK
* THE FIRST LINE CONTAINS THE NUMBER OF BLOCKS TO BE RUN AND
* THE JIN AND JOUT INTERFACE FILE UNIT NUMBERS.
* (NOTE THAT A SECOND BLOCK IS NOT RUN IN THIS EXAMPLE.)
* NBLOCK JIN(1) JOUT(1) JIN(2) JOUT(2)
SW 2 0 10 10 0
* THE SECOND LINE CONTAINS UP TO 6 SCRATCH FILE UNIT NUMBERS.
MM 6 11 12 13 14 15 16
* FILE 10 (OR ANY UNIT NUMBER) COULD BE PERMANENTLY SAVED.
* @ 10 'SAVE10.OUT'
* CALL THE RUNOFF BLOCK USING $RUNOFF
$RUNOFF
* THERE ARE TWO A1 OR TITLE CARDS IN EVERY BLOCK.
* ALL CHARACTER DATA MUST BE ENLOSED IN SINGLE QUOTES.
A1 'RUNOFF EXAMPLE 2, SIMPLE CONFIGURATION, 100 % IMPERVIOUS'
A1 'SINGLE CATCHMENT PLUS SINGLE PIPE, CONST. RAIN'
* COMMENT LINES CAN BE USED TO IDENTIFY INPUT VARIABLES.
* METRIC ISNOW NRGAG INFILM KWALTY IVAP NHR NMN NDAY MONTH IYRSTR
B1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 12 88
B2 0 0 2
* 5-MIN TIME STEP, 2-HR SIMULATION
B3 300. 300. 300. 2 2.0
B4 0 0
D1 0
* KTYPE KINC KPRINT KTHIS KTIME KPREP NHISTO THISTO TZRAIN
E1 2 1 0 0 0 0 3 60.0 0.0
* STEP-FUNCTION HYETOGRAPH
* TIME=REIN(1) RAIN=REIN(2)
E3 0.0 1.0
E3 60.0 0.0
E3 120.0 0.0
* 2-FT DIAMETER CIRCULAR PIPE
* NAMEG NGTO NPG GWIDTH GLEN G3 GS1 GS2 G6 DFULL GDEPTH
G1 101 102 2 2.0 300.0 0.005 0.0 0.0 0.014 0.0 0.0
* 2-AC IMPERVIOUS CATCHMENT
* JK NAMEW NGTO WW1 WW2 WW3 WW4 WW5 WW6 WW7 WW8 WW9 WW10 WW11
H1 1 201 101 200.0 2.0 100.0 0.01 0.020 0.20 0.03 0.3 3.0 0.3 0.001
* PRINT CONTROL PARAMETERS
M1 2 1
* DEFAULT STARTING AND STOPPING PRINT TIME IS DURATION OF SIMULATION.
M2 1 0 0
* PRINT HYDROGRAPHS FOR PIPE 101 AND INLET 102.
M3 101 102
* END THE SWMM SIMULATION BY USING $ENDPROGRAM.
* (ANOTHER BLOCK COULD FOLLOW INSTEAD.)
$COMBIN
A1 5
$ENDPROGRAM
Attachments:

▶ Reply to This

Robert E Dickinson Permalink Reply by Robert E Dickinson on January 17, 2010 at 12:26pm
SW 1 9 8
MM 6 21 20 30 31 32 33
@ 8 'SCR.DAT'
$RUNOFF
A1 'SINGLE EVENT SNOWMELT'
A1 ' FREE FORMATTED INPUT WITH COMMENTS'
* METRIC ISNOW NRGAG INFILM KWALTY IVAP NHR NMN NDAY MONTH IYRSTR
B1 0 1 1 1 0 1 12 0 1 7 87
B2 0 0 1
* WET WET/DRY DRY LUNIT LONG
B3 300. 900.0 86400. 3 1.0
* SNOWMELT DATA
* ELEV FWFRAC1 FWFRAC2
C1 850.0 0.03 0.05
* NUMB MONTH WIND MONTH WIND
C2 12 1 10.50 2 10.7 3 11.3 4 12.5 5 11.6 6 10.7 7 9.30 8 9.10 9 10.0 10 10.5 11 11.1 12 10.4
* AIR TEMPERATURES
* DTAIR NAIRT TAIR(1) ===== TAIR(8)
C5 3.0 8 23.0 25.0 33.0 45.0 50.0 60.0 55.0 40.0
D1 0
* KTYPE KINC KPRINT KTHIS KTIME KPREP NHISTO THISTO TZRAIN
E1 1 3 0 0 0 1 14 15.0 720.0
* TIME RAIN TIME RAIN TIME RAIN
E3 0.0 -2.00 30 -2.00 60 -2.00
E3 90 2.00 120 2.00 150 2.00
E3 180 2.00 210 2.00 240 2.00
E3 270 2.00 330 2.00 360 2.00
E3 390 2.00 450 2.00
*
F1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
* NAMEG NGTO NPG GWIDTH GLEN G3 GS1 GS2 G6 DFULL GDEPTH
G1 1 2 2 20.0 1000. 0.01 0.23 0.33 0.020 10.0 0.1
* JK NAMEW NGTO WIDTH AREA %IMP SLP IMPN PERVN IDS PDS MAX MIN DECAY
H1 1 100 1 100. 300 50. .001 .04 .30 .00 .00 5.0 5.00 .001
* SUBCATCHMENT SNOWMELT DATA
* NAMEW SNN1 SNCP SNN3 SNN4 SNN5 SNN6 SN(1) SN(2) SN(3) SN(4)
I1 100 0.40 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.00 0.0 0.006 0.0060 31.0 32.0
*
M1 2 5
M2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
M3 1 2
$ENDPROGRAM
Attachments:

▶ Reply to This

Robert E Dickinson Permalink Reply by Robert E Dickinson on January 17, 2010 at 12:28pm
SW 1 9 8
MM 6 21 20 30 31 32 33
$RUNOFF
A1 'RUNOFF EXAMPLE 8, PARABOLIC CHANNELS, NO GROUNDWATER'
A1 'SIMILAR TO RUNOFF EXAMPLE 1 - VERY LARGE/LONG CHANNELS'
* METRIC ISNOW NRGAG INFILM KWALTY IVAP NHR NMN NDAY MONTH IYRSTR
B1 0 0 1 1 0 1 00 0 1 7 87
B2 0 0 1
* WET WET/DRY DRY LUNIT LONG
B3 300. 900.0 86400. 2 36.0
D1 0
* KTYPE KINC KPRINT KTHIS KTIME KPREP NHISTO THISTO TZRAIN
E1 1 3 0 0 0 1 6 15.0 0.0
* INPUT DEPTHS OVER THE 15-MIN. TIME STEP. (HEAVY RAIN!)
* TIME RAIN TIME RAIN TIME RAIN
E3 0.0 2.00 30 2.00 60 2.00
E3 90 2.00 120 2.00 150 2.00
*
F1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
* NAMEG NGTO NPG GWIDTH GLEN G3 GS1 GS2 G6 DFULL GDEPTH
G1 -1 0 0 0 2.0 0 0 0 0 0 0
G1 1 2 7 120.0 10000. 0.01 0.23 0.33 0.020 10.0 0.0
G2 0 3.0 3.3 1.0
G1 2 7 4 120.0 10000. 0.01 0.23 0.33 0.020 10.0 0.0
G1 3 4 4 120.0 10000. 0.01 0.23 0.33 0.020 10.0 0.0
G1 4 7 4 120.0 10000. 0.01 0.23 0.33 0.020 10.0 0.0
G1 5 7 4 120.0 10000. 0.01 0.23 0.33 0.020 10.0 0.0
G1 6 5 4 120.0 10000. 0.01 0.23 0.33 0.020 10.0 0.0
*
* JK NAMEW NGTO WIDTH AREA %IMP SLP IMPN PERVN IDS PDS MAX MIN DECAY
H1 0 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0
H1 1 1 1 10. 300 1. .001 .04 .30 .00 .00 5.0 5.00 .001
H1 1 2 3 10. 500 1. .001 .04 .30 .00 .00 5.0 5.00 .001
H1 1 3 6 10. 500 1. .001 .04 .30 .00 .00 5.0 5.00 .001
H1 1 4 5 10. 500 1. .001 .04 .30 .00 .00 5.0 5.00 .001
*
M1 7 10
M2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
M3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
$ENDPROGRAM
Attachments:

▶ Reply to This

Robert E Dickinson Permalink Reply by Robert E Dickinson on January 17, 2010 at 12:31pm
SW 1 9 8
MM 6 21 20 30 31 32 33
$RUNOFF
A1 'PCSWMM 3.2 EXERCISE 1C '
A1 'SINGLE SUBCATCHMENT WITH STEEPER SLOPE AND A UNIFORM RAINFALL'
* METRIC ISNOW NRGAG INFILM KWALTY IVAP NHR NMN NDAY MONTH IYRSTR
B1 0 0 1 0 0 1 12 0 23 5 85
B2 0 0 1
* WET WET/DRY DRY LUNIT LONG
B3 300. 300.0 86400. 1 14400.0
* PCTZER REGEN
B4 30.0 0.05
D1 0
* KTYPE KINC KPRINT KTHIS KTIME KPREP NHISTO THISTO TZRAIN
E1 0 12 0 0 0 0 432 5.0 720.0
* INPUT CONSTANT INTENSITY 5-MIN. TIME STEP.
* RAIN RAIN RAIN
E3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
E3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
E3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
E3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
E3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
E3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
E3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
E3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
E3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
E3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
E3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
E3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
E3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
E3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
E3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
E3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
E3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
E3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
E3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
E3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
E3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
E3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
E3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
E3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
E3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
E3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
E3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
E3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
E3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
E3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
E3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
E3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
E3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
E3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
E3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
E3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
*
F1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
* NO SIMULATED CHANNEL/PIPES
* SLOPE CHANGED FROM 0.02 TO 0.20
* JK NAMEW NGTO WIDTH AREA %IMP SLP IMPN PERVN IDS PDS MAX MIN DECAY
H1 1 101 301 997. 10.0 40. .20 .017 .025 .05 .20 3.0 0.30 .001
*
M1 1 1
M2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
M3 301
$ENDPROGRAM
Attachments:

▶ Reply to This

Robert E Dickinson Permalink Reply by Robert E Dickinson on January 17, 2010 at 12:32pm
SW 1 9 8
MM 6 21 20 30 31 32 33
$RUNOFF
A1 'PCSWMM 3.2 EXERCISE 1D - runoff example 14'
A1 'SINGLE SUBCATCHMENT COMPLETELY IMPERVIOUS'
* METRIC ISNOW NRGAG INFILM KWALTY IVAP NHR NMN NDAY MONTH IYRSTR
B1 0 0 1 0 0 1 12 0 23 5 85
B2 0 0 1
* WET WET/DRY DRY LUNIT LONG
B3 300. 300.0 86400. 1 250.0
* PCTZER REGEN
B4 30.0 0.01
D1 0
* KTYPE KINC KPRINT KTHIS KTIME KPREP NHISTO THISTO TZRAIN
E1 0 12 0 0 0 0 12 5.0 720.0
* INPUT CONSTANT INTENSITY 5-MIN. TIME STEP.
* RAIN RAIN RAIN
E3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
*
F1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
* NO SIMULATED CHANNEL/PIPES
* JK NAMEW NGTO WIDTH AREA %IMP SLP IMPN PERVN IDS PDS MAX MIN DECAY
H1 1 101 301 997. 10.0 100. .020 .017 .025 .05 .20 3.0 0.30 .001115
*
M1 1 1
M2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
M3 301
$ENDPROGRAM
Attachments:

▶ Reply to This

Robert E Dickinson Permalink Reply by Robert E Dickinson on January 17, 2010 at 12:34pm
SW 1 9 8
MM 6 21 20 30 31 32 33
$RUNOFF
A1 'PCSWMM 3.2 EXERCISE 1F '
A1 'SINGLE SUBCATCHMENT, LOW INFILTRATION AND HIGH RAINFALL'
* METRIC ISNOW NRGAG INFILM KWALTY IVAP NHR NMN NDAY MONTH IYRSTR
B1 0 0 1 0 0 1 12 0 23 5 85
B2 0 0 1
* WET WET/DRY DRY LUNIT LONG
B3 300. 300.0 86400. 1 250.0
* PCTZER REGEN
B4 30.0 0.01
D1 0
* KTYPE KINC KPRINT KTHIS KTIME KPREP NHISTO THISTO TZRAIN
E1 0 12 0 0 0 0 24 5.0 720.0
* INPUT CONSTANT INTENSITY 5-MIN. TIME STEP.
* RAIN RAIN RAIN
E3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
E3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
*
F1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
* NO SIMULATED CHANNEL/PIPES
*
* JK NAMEW NGTO WIDTH AREA %IMP SLP IMPN PERVN IDS PDS MAX MIN DECAY
H1 1 101 301 997. 10.0 40. .020 .017 .025 .05 .20 0.30 0.30 .001115
*
M1 1 1
M2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
M3 301
$ENDPROGRAM
Attachments:

▶ Reply to This

Robert E Dickinson Permalink Reply by Robert E Dickinson on January 17, 2010 at 12:37pm
SW 1 9 8
MM 6 21 20 30 31 32 33
# SWMM5_CALIBRATION_FILE
$RUNOFF
A1 'RUNOFF EXAMPLE # 19 - PCSWMM 3.2 EXERCISE 4A '
A1 'HYDROGRAPH GENERATION FOR INPUT TO EXTRAN '
* METRIC ISNOW NRGAG INFILM KWALTY IVAP NHR NMN NDAY MONTH IYRSTR
B1 0 0 1 0 0 0 12 0 23 5 85
B2 0 0 1
* WET WET/DRY DRY LUNIT LONG
B3 300. 300.0 300 1 250.0
* PCTZER REGEN
B4 30.0 0.01
D1 0
* KTYPE KINC KPRINT KTHIS KTIME KPREP NHISTO THISTO TZRAIN
E1 0 12 0 0 0 0 12 5.0 720.0
* INPUT CONSTANT INTENSITY 5-MIN. TIME STEP.
* RAIN RAIN RAIN
E3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
*
* EVAPORATION DATA NOT READ ON DATA GROUP F1. DEFAULT OF 0.10 INCH/MONTH.
*
* NO CHANNEL/PIPE DATA REQUIRED
*
* JK NAMEW NGTO WIDTH AREA %IMP SLP IMPN PERVN IDS PDS MAX MIN DECAY
H1 1 101 301 997. 10.0 40. .020 .017 .025 .05 .20 3.0 0.30 .001115
H1 1 102 201 997. 10.0 40. .020 .017 .025 .05 .20 3.0 0.30 .001115
*
M1 2 1
M2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
M3 301 201
$ENDPROGRAM
Attachments:

▶ Reply to This

Robert E Dickinson Permalink Reply by Robert E Dickinson on January 17, 2010 at 1:09pm
SW 2 9 8 8 0
MM 6 21 20 30 31 32 33
$RUNOFF
A1 'RUNOFF EXAMPLE # 22 - SIMULATION OF EROSION '
A1 'SUSPENDED SOLIDS AND BOD POLLUTOGRAPH SIMULATION '
* METRIC ISNOW NRGAG INFILM KWALTY IVAP NHR NMN NDAY MONTH IYRSTR
B1 0 0 1 0 1 0 12 0 23 5 85
B2 0 0 1
* WET WET/DRY DRY LUNIT LONG
B3 300. 300.0 86400. 1 250.0
* PCTZER REGEN
B4 30.0 0.01
D1 0
* KTYPE KINC KPRINT KTHIS KTIME KPREP NHISTO THISTO TZRAIN
E1 0 12 0 0 0 0 12 5.0 720.0
* Input constant intensity 5-min. Time step.
* Rain Rain Rain
E3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
*
* EVAPORATION DATA NOT READ ON DATA GROUP F1. DEFAULT OF 0.10 INCH/MONTH.
*
* NAMEG NGTO NPG GWIDTH GLEN G3 GS1 GS2 G6 DFULL GDEPTH
G1 301 201 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
*
* JK NAMEW NGTO WIDTH AREA %IMP SLP IMPN PERVN IDS PDS MAX MIN DECAY
H1 1 101 301 997. 10.0 40. .020 .017 .025 .05 .20 3.0 0.30 .001115
H1 1 102 201 997. 10.0 40. .020 .017 .025 .05 .20 3.0 0.30 .001115
*
* NQS JLAND IROS IROSAD DRYDRY CBVOL DRYBSN RAINIT REFFDD KLNBGN KLNEND
J1 2 2 1 0 5.00 20.0 1.00 0.30 0.50 0 0
* LNAME METHOD JACGUT DDLIM DDPOW DDFACT CLFREQ AVSWP DSLCL
J2 'SINGLE' 0 0 1.E04 1.0 1.0 30.0 0.80 15.0
J2 'MULTI ' 0 0 1.E04 1.0 1.0 30.0 0.80 15.0
* PNAME PUNIT NDIM KALC KWASH KACGUT LINKUP QFACT1 QFACT2 QFACT3 QFACT4 QFACT5 WASHPO RCOEF CBFACT CONCRN REFF
J3 'TOT.SOL' 'MG/L' 0 0 0 0 0 100. 100. 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 10.0 0.0 0.5
J3 ' BOD5 ' 'MG/L' 0 0 0 0 0 7. 7. 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 20.0 0.0 0.5
* KTO KFROM F1
J4 2 1 0.02
* EROSION DATA
* NAMEW ERODAR ERLEN SOILF CROPMF CONTPF
K1 101 2.0 300.0 0.43 1.0 1.0
K1 102 2.0 300.0 0.43 1.0 1.0
*
* NAMEW KL BA GQ
L1 101 1 200.0 50.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
L1 102 2 100.0 25.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
M1 2 5
M2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
M3 301 201
$COMBIN
* ICOMB
A1 5
$ENDPROGRAM
Attachments:

▶ Reply to This

Robert E Dickinson Permalink Reply by Robert E Dickinson on January 17, 2010 at 1:11pm
SW 1 9 8
MM 6 21 20 30 31 32 33
# SWMM5_CALIBRATION_FILE
$RUNOFF
A1 'PCSWMM 3.2 EXERCISE 12 - RUNOFF EXAMPLE # 24'
A1 'SINGLE SUBCATCHMENT WITH SNOWMELT'
* METRIC ISNOW NRGAG INFILM KWALTY IVAP NHR NMN NDAY MONTH IYRSTR
B1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 5 85
B2 0 0 1
* WET WET/DRY DRY LUNIT LONG
B3 300. 300.0 300. 1 1500.0
* PCTZER REGEN
B4 30.0 0.01
* SNOWMELT DATA
* ELEV FWFRAC1 FWFRAC2
C1 600.0 0.05 0.05
* NUMB MONTH WIND
C2 1 5 10.0
* AIR TEMPERATURES
* DTAIR NAIRT TAIR(1) ===== TAIR(12)
C5 1.0 25 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 34.0 36.0 38.0 44.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 48.0 46.0 45.0 40.0 36.0 34.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0
D1 0
* KTYPE KINC KPRINT KTHIS KTIME KPREP NHISTO THISTO TZRAIN
E1 0 12 0 0 0 0 1 5.0 0.0
* NO RAIN ONLY SNOWMELT
* RAIN
E3 0.0
* ZERO EVAPORATION DATA
F1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
* NO SIMULATED CHANNEL/PIPES
*
* JK NAMEW NGTO WIDTH AREA %IMP SLP IMPN PERVN IDS PDS MAX MIN DECAY
H1 1 101 301 997. 10.0 100. .20 .017 .025 .05 .20 3.0 0.30 .001115
* SUBCATCHMENT SNOWMELT INFORMATION
* NAMEW SNN1 SNCP SNN3 SNN4 SNN5 SNN6 SN(1) SN(2) SN(3) SN(4)
I1 101 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.0 0.004 0.004 32.0 32.0
*
M1 1 1
M2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
M3 301
$ENDPROGRAM
Attachments:

▶ Reply to This

Robert E Dickinson Permalink Reply by Robert E Dickinson on January 17, 2010 at 1:12pm
SW 2 9 8 9 8
MM 6 21 20 30 31 32 33
$RUNOFF
A1 'RUNOFF EXAMPLE 27, PARABOLIC CHANNELS, GROUNDWATER'
A1 'HEAVY RAIN CAUSES WATER TABLE TO REACH SURFACE - 4 RAINGAGES '
* METRIC ISNOW NRGAG INFILM KWALTY IVAP NHR NMN NDAY MONTH IYRSTR
B1 0 0 4 1 0 1 00 0 1 7 87
* INPUT GRAPHS SUMMARY
B2 0 1 1
* WET WET/DRY DRY LUNIT LONG
B3 900. 1800.0 86400. 2 36.0
D1 0
* EXAMPLE OF KTYPE = 2 PRECIPITATION
*
* KTYPE KINC KPRINT KTHIS KTIME KPREP NHISTO THISTO TZRAIN
E1 2 3 0 0 0 1 6 15.0 0.0
* INPUT DEPTHS OVER THE 15-MIN. TIME STEP. (HEAVY RAIN!)
* TIME RAIN TIME RAIN TIME RAIN
* GAGE #1 GAGE #2 GAGE #3 GAGE #4
E3 0.0 2.00 1.0 3.0 0.5
E3 30.0 2.00 1.0 3.0 0.5
E3 60.0 2.00 1.0 3.0 0.5
E3 90.0 2.00 1.0 3.0 0.5
E3 120. 2.00 1.0 3.0 0.5
E3 150. 2.00 1.0 3.0 0.5
*
F1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
* NAMEG NGTO NPG GWIDTH GLEN G3 GS1 GS2 G6 DFULL GDEPTH
G1 -1 0 0 0 2.0 0 0 0 0 0 0
G1 1 2 7 20.0 1000. 0.01 0.23 0.33 0.020 10.0 0.0
G2 0 3.0 3.3 1.0
G1 2 7 4 20.0 1000. 0.01 0.23 0.33 0.020 10.0 0.0
G1 3 4 4 20.0 1000. 0.01 0.23 0.33 0.020 10.0 0.0
G1 4 7 4 20.0 1000. 0.01 0.23 0.33 0.020 10.0 0.0
G1 5 7 4 20.0 1000. 0.01 0.23 0.33 0.020 10.0 0.0
G1 6 5 4 20.0 1000. 0.01 0.23 0.33 0.020 10.0 0.0
*
* JK NAMEW NGTO WIDTH AREA %IMP SLP IMPN PERVN IDS PDS MAX MIN DECAY
H1 0 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.0 0 0 0.0 0. 0.0
H1 1 1 1 10. 300 10. .001 .04 .30 .00 .00 5.0 5.00 .001
* NMSUB NGWGW ISFPF ISFGF BELEV GRELEV STG BC TW
H2 1 1 1 0 0.0 20.0 8.55 8.55 8.55
* A1 B1 A2 B2 A3 POR WP FC HKSAT TH1
H3 4.5E-5 2.6 0.0 1.0 0.0 .46 .15 .30 5.0 .301
* HCO PCO CET DP DET
H4 10. 15. 0.35 2.E-03 14.0
H1 2 2 3 10. 500 10. .001 .04 .30 .00 .00 5.0 5.00 .001
H2 2 3 1 1 0.0 20.0 8.55 8.55 8.55
H3 4.5E-5 2.6 0.0 1.0 0.0 .46 .15 .30 5.0 .301
H4 10. 15. 0.35 2.E-03 14.0
H1 3 3 6 10. 500 10. .001 .04 .30 .00 .00 5.0 5.00 .001
H1 4 4 5 10. 500 10. .001 .04 .30 .00 .00 5.0 5.00 .001
*
M1 7 10
M2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
M3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
$ENDPROGRAM
Attachments:

▶ Reply to This

Robert E Dickinson Permalink Reply by Robert E Dickinson on January 17, 2010 at 1:16pm
SW 3 9 8 8 0 8 10
MM 7 21 20 30 31 32 33 34
@ 8 'RUNOFF30.INT'
* Enter $ANUM to read in alphanumeric names for channels and subcatchments.
# SWMM5_CALIBRATION_FILE
$ANUM
$RUNOFF
* ALPHANUMERIC SUBCATCHMENT NAMES
* ALPHANUMERIC CHANNEL NAMES
*
A1 'Runoff example 30, parabolic channels, groundwater, print channel depths'
A1 'HEAVY RAIN CAUSES WATER TABLE TO REACH SURFACE'
* METRIC ISNOW NRGAG INFILM KWALTY IVAP NHR NMN NDAY MONTH IYRSTR
B1 1 0 1 1 0 1 00 0 1 7 87
B2 0 0 0
* WET WET/DRY DRY LUNIT LONG
B3 900. 900.0 86400. 2 36.0
D1 0
* KTYPE KINC KPRINT KTHIS KTIME KPREP NHISTO THISTO TZRAIN
E1 1 3 0 0 0 1 6 15.0 0.0
* INPUT DEPTHS OVER THE 15-MIN. TIME STEP. (HEAVY RAIN!)
* TIME RAIN TIME RAIN TIME RAIN
E3 0.0 2.00 30 2.00 60 2.00
E3 90 2.00 120 2.00 150 2.00
*
F1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
* NAMEG NGTO NPG GWIDTH GLEN G3 GS1 GS2 G6 DFULL GDEPTH
G1 '-1' ' 0' 0 0 2.0 0 0 0 0 0 0
G1 'Chan1' 'Chan2' 7 20.0 1000. 0.01 0.23 0.33 0.020 10.0 0.0
G2 0 3.0 3.3 1.0
* KAMEG KGTO NPG GWIDTH GLEN G3 GS1 GS2 G6 DFULL GDEPTH
G1 'Chan2' 'Chan3' 4 20.0 1000. 0.01 0.23 0.33 0.020 10.0 0.0
G1 'Chan3' 'Chan4' 4 20.0 1000. 0.01 0.23 0.33 0.020 10.0 0.0
G1 'Chan4' 'Node7' 4 20.0 1000. 0.01 0.23 0.33 0.020 10.0 0.0
G1 'Chan5' 'Node7' 4 20.0 1000. 0.01 0.23 0.33 0.020 10.0 0.0
G1 'Chan6' 'Chan5' 4 20.0 1000. 0.01 0.23 0.33 0.020 10.0 0.0
* Subcatchment information
* JK NAMEW NGTO WIDTH AREA %IMP SLP IMPN PERVN IDS PDS MAX MIN DECAY
H1 0 '-1' ' 0' 0 0 0 0 0 2.0 0 0 0.0 0. 0.0
H1 1 'Wat1' 'Chan1' 10. 300 1. .001 .04 .30 .00 .00 5.0 5.00 .001
* First groundwater subcatchment
* NMSUB NGWGW ISFPF ISFGF BELEV GRELEV STG BC TW
H2 'Wat1' 'Chan1' 1 0 0.0 20.0 8.55 8.55 8.55
* A1 B1 A2 B2 A3 POR WP FC HKSAT TH1
H3 4.5E-5 2.6 0.0 1.0 0.0 .46 .15 .30 5.0 .301
* HCO PCO CET DP DET
H4 10. 15. 0.35 2.E-03 14.0
H1 1 'Wat2' 'Chan2' 10. 500 1. .001 .04 .30 .00 .00 5.0 5.00 .001
* Second groundwater subcatchment
* NMSUB NGWGW ISFPF ISFGF BELEV GRELEV STG BC TW
H2 'Wat2' 'Chan2' 1 1 0.0 20.0 8.55 8.55 8.55
H3 4.5E-5 2.6 0.0 1.0 0.0 .46 .15 .30 5.0 .301
H4 10. 15. 0.35 2.E-03 14.0
H1 1 'Wat3' 'Chan6' 10. 500 1. .001 .04 .30 .00 .00 5.0 5.00 .001
H1 1 'Wat4' 'Chan5' 10. 500 1. .001 .04 .30 .00 .00 5.0 5.00 .001
*
M1 7 10
M2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
M3 'Chan1' 'Chan2' 'Chan3' 'Chan4' 'Chan5' 'Chan6' 'Node7'
M4 2 'Chan1' 'Chan2'
$COMBIN
* ICOMB
A1 5
*
$STATS
* ISTART TSTART IEND TEND INLOG JCUBE JSEA
A1 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 1 0
* MIT BASE EBASE LOCRQ LOCRN NPR NPOINT METRIC LRET PLOTTING POS(A)
B1 0.0 0.0 0.0 'Node7' 0 0 50 1 1 0.4
* KSEQ KTERM KTSEQS
B2 1 0 1
*
C1 1001 1001 1001 1001 1001
*
$ENDPROGRAM
Attachments:

▶ Reply to This

Robert E Dickinson Permalink Reply by Robert E Dickinson on January 17, 2010 at 1:17pm
SW 1 9 8
MM 6 21 20 30 31 32 33
$RUNOFF
A1 'Runoff example number 33 - small horton infiltration'
A1 'SINGLE SUBCATCHMENT, LOW INFILTRATION AND HIGH RAINFALL'
* METRIC ISNOW NRGAG INFILM KWALTY IVAP NHR NMN NDAY MONTH IYRSTR
B1 0 0 1 0 0 1 12 0 23 5 85
B2 0 0 1
* WET WET/DRY DRY LUNIT LONG
B3 300. 300.0 86400. 2 12.0
* PCTZER REGEN
B4 30.0 0.01
D1 0
* KTYPE KINC KPRINT KTHIS KTIME KPREP NHISTO THISTO TZRAIN
E1 0 12 0 0 0 0 12 30.0 720.0
* INPUT CONSTANT INTENSITY 15-MIN. TIME STEP.
* RAIN RAIN RAIN
E3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
*
F1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
* NO SIMULATED CHANNEL/PIPES
*
* JK NAMEW NGTO WIDTH AREA %IMP SLP IMPN PERVN IDS PDS MAX MIN DECAY
H1 1 101 301 997. 10.0 40. .020 .017 .025 .05 .20 9.00 0.005 .001115
*
M1 1 1
M2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
M3 301
$ENDPROGRAM
Attachments:

▶ Reply to This

RSS

Latest Activity

Robert E Dickinson commented on Robert E Dickinson's photo 'Link and Node Time Steps'
The time step used during the simulation at any one time is the minimum of the link and node time steps. As the example shown below shows usually the link time step (based on the CFL) condition is more restrictive than the node time step. In the ima…
on Wednesday
Xiaoyan Huang is now a member of SWMM5 - Stormwater Management Model
Welcome Them!
July 22
Robert E Dickinson added a blog post
Shanghai Makes MWH Soft’s InfoWorks WS Solution Its Water Distribution Modeling Platform Largest City in World’s Most Populous Country Looks to Advanced MWH Soft Technologyto Improve Drinking Water Operations and Planning Broomfield, Colorado US…
July 14
Robert E Dickinson left a comment for Alan
July 13
Alan is now a member of SWMM5 - Stormwater Management Model
Welcome Them!
July 13
Robert E Dickinson added a blog post
From a Stanford University Study as described in Science Daily Seasonal records The Stanford team also forecast a dramatic spike in extreme seasonal temperatures during the current decade. Temperatures equaling the hottest season on record from 19…
July 11
Robert E Dickinson left a comment for Reza Imani
July 11
Reza Imani is now a member of SWMM5 - Stormwater Management Model
Welcome Them!
July 11
Robert E Dickinson added a blog post
New MWH Soft InfoWater V8 Is First Hydraulic Modeling Software for ArcGIS 10 Eighth Generation Shows Company’s Commitment to ArcGIS Platform Broomfield, Colorado USA, July 7, 2010 — MWH Soft, a leading global innovator of wet infrastructure mode…
July 7
Basil Jamison is now a member of SWMM5 - Stormwater Management Model
Welcome Them!
July 5
Robert E Dickinson added a page
SWMM5 Routing Time Step Summary
July 4
Robert E Dickinson added a blog post
Routing Time Step Summary
July 3
Robert E Dickinson added a page
Node Convergence in SWMM 5
July 3
Robert E Dickinson added a blog post
Explicit Iteration Hydraulic Computation and Implicit Time Step Hydraulic Computations in SWMM 5 The dynamic wave solution in SWMM 5 and InfoSWMM uses an interlocking explicit iteration in an overall time step implicit calculation of the node dep…
July 2
A blog post by Robert E Dickinson was featured
MWH Soft Launches Technical Webinar Series Inaugural Eight-Week Series for Wet Infrastructure Utilities and Consultants Begins July 16 Broomfield, Colorado USA, June 30, 2010 — MWH Soft, a leading global innovator of wet infrastructure modeling…
June 30
Robert E Dickinson added a blog post
MWH Soft Launches Technical Webinar Series Inaugural Eight-Week Series for Wet Infrastructure Utilities and Consultants Begins July 16 Broomfield, Colorado USA, June 30, 2010 — MWH Soft, a leading global innovator of wet infrastructure modeling…
June 30
Joaquim Egea i Martinez is now a member of SWMM5 - Stormwater Management Model
Welcome Them!
June 24
Robert E Dickinson added a blog post
MWH Soft Unveils Highly Anticipated InfoWorks TS for Comprehensive Hydraulic Transient Analysisof Water Distribution Systems Fourth Quarter 2010 Release to Deliver Unprecedented Transient Modeling Capabilities for Better Decision-Making Broomfiel…
June 16
Aren Matta added a discussion
Modeling of CSO Control Technologies in SWMM
Hello All   I was wondering if any of you have worked on CSO control alternatives as the city i reside is looking for alternatives assessment.   Some of the alternatives we have are :     Satellite Treatment WWTP's (There has to be more than storage…
June 15
Robert E Dickinson added a blog post
The “Hockey Stick” evolution By andyrussellThis is a post that aims to go through the evolution of the “Hockey Stick” from 1990 to the present day. It naturally misses out parts of the story, which deserve far more analysis, simply to keep the post…
June 15

© 2010   Created by Robert E Dickinson.

Badges  |  Report An Issue | SWMM 5 Blog  |  Terms of Service