SWMM5 - Stormwater Management Model

SWMM 5, Watersheds, Water Quality,Hydrology, Hydraulics - Watersheds

SWMM 3,4,5 uses a spatial step equal to the length of the link. Or, in terms of the 1D St. Venant Equation for the calculation of flow used in SWMM 5:



In which is the length of the conduit.

The program will calculate the cross sectional area, hydraulic radius top width and depth at the upstream, midpoint and downstream sections of the link. The link solution is pivoted on the midpoint cross sectional area in the dominant dynamic wave terms and
and the non-linear term in the dynamic wave equation uses the upstream and downstream link cross sectional areas. In the finite difference equation in SWMM 5 the pipe shown below would have one length but use the cross sectional information from the upstream, midpoint and downstream points of the link.

The bend in the pipe would be modeled using the "other" category of losses




Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Option "Define Supercritical Flow By" does inside the SWMM 5 engine. The options are called Slope, Froude and Bothin the GUI and in the engine of SWMM 5. A few other variable definitions you need to know to understand this explanation are: (1) Y1 for the upstream link depth, (2) Y2 for the downstream link depth, (3) Q for the flow in the link, (4)Qfull for the full Manning's equation flow or normal flow for the link based on the bed slope, (5) Froude1 and Froude2 for the Froude Number respectively of the upstream and downstream ends of the link, (6) n for Manning's roughness, (7) Yfull for the maximum depth of the link and (8) Qnormal for the Normal Flow equation flow based on the upstream area of the link (A1) and the upstream hydraulic radius (R1).


In the SWMM 5 engine these options are used after the dynamic wave equation flow is estimated using the St. Venant equation. The option that you choose is only active for those links that have a flow greater than 0, links with negative flow use the dynamic wave equation flow exclusively. It the flow is positive and the link is an open channel and full then the minimum of the dynamic wave flow or Qfull is used as the new flow in the link. If the flow is positive and the depth at the upstream end of the link or Y1 is less than Yfull then the engine will compare Qnormal to Q using the routines in Check Normal Flow.


If the link gets to the Check Normal Flow routines then it uses the following logic:
  • If the Slope or Both option is used or either the upstream node or the downstream node of the link is an outfall AND Y1 is less than Y2 then the minimum of Q from the dynamic wave equation or Q from the Normal Flow equation is used as the current iteration flow in link, or
  • If the Froude or Both option AND either the upstream Froude Number or the downstream Froude number is greater than 1 then the minimum of Q from the dynamic wave equation or Q from the Normal Flow equation is used as the current iteration flow in link. This condition is never used if either of the connecting nodes of the link are outfalls.

How does this work in the actual flow that SWMM 5 estimates for a link? Consider this example in which the link flow in blue is plotted with the Qnormal flow in red and the Q dynamic wave equation flow in purple:

Qnormal is



Qnormal is only calculated when the link is not full so in the plot a Qnormal of 0 means that the pipe was full. At other times the flow in the link was equal to Qnormal as the minimum of the dynamic equation flow or the Qnormal flow is used at each iteration in the solution process. The flow is normally bounded by the Qnormal flow in SWMM 5.0.013. Your choice of the options Slope, Froude andBoth really only impact the conditions under which this comparison is true. If you use Froude or Both then Supercritical flow at either end of the link will trigger this comparison will be the dynamic wave equation flow and the Froude number at each end of the link.


Reply to This

RSS

Latest Activity

The time step used during the simulation at any one time is the minimum of the link and node time steps. As the example shown below shows usually the link time step (based on the CFL) condition is more restrictive than the node time step. In the ima…
on Wednesday
Xiaoyan Huang is now a member of SWMM5 - Stormwater Management Model
July 22
Robert E Dickinson added a blog post
Shanghai Makes MWH Soft’s InfoWorks WS Solution Its Water Distribution Modeling Platform Largest City in World’s Most Populous Country Looks to Advanced MWH Soft Technologyto Improve Drinking Water Operations and Planning Broomfield, Colorado US…
July 14
July 13
Alan is now a member of SWMM5 - Stormwater Management Model
July 13
Robert E Dickinson added a blog post
From a Stanford University Study as described in Science Daily Seasonal records The Stanford team also forecast a dramatic spike in extreme seasonal temperatures during the current decade. Temperatures equaling the hottest season on record from 19…
July 11
July 11
Reza Imani is now a member of SWMM5 - Stormwater Management Model
July 11
Robert E Dickinson added a blog post
New MWH Soft InfoWater V8 Is First Hydraulic Modeling Software for ArcGIS 10 Eighth Generation Shows Company’s Commitment to ArcGIS Platform Broomfield, Colorado USA, July 7, 2010 — MWH Soft, a leading global innovator of wet infrastructure mode…
July 7
Basil Jamison is now a member of SWMM5 - Stormwater Management Model
July 5
Robert E Dickinson added a page
July 4
Robert E Dickinson added a blog post
Routing Time Step Summary
July 3
Robert E Dickinson added a page
July 3
Robert E Dickinson added a blog post
Explicit Iteration Hydraulic Computation and Implicit Time Step Hydraulic Computations in SWMM 5 The dynamic wave solution in SWMM 5 and InfoSWMM uses an interlocking explicit iteration in an overall time step implicit calculation of the node dep…
July 2
A blog post by Robert E Dickinson was featured
MWH Soft Launches Technical Webinar Series Inaugural Eight-Week Series for Wet Infrastructure Utilities and Consultants Begins July 16 Broomfield, Colorado USA, June 30, 2010 — MWH Soft, a leading global innovator of wet infrastructure modeling…
June 30
Robert E Dickinson added a blog post
MWH Soft Launches Technical Webinar Series Inaugural Eight-Week Series for Wet Infrastructure Utilities and Consultants Begins July 16 Broomfield, Colorado USA, June 30, 2010 — MWH Soft, a leading global innovator of wet infrastructure modeling…
June 30
Joaquim Egea i Martinez is now a member of SWMM5 - Stormwater Management Model
June 24
Robert E Dickinson added a blog post
MWH Soft Unveils Highly Anticipated InfoWorks TS for Comprehensive Hydraulic Transient Analysisof Water Distribution Systems Fourth Quarter 2010 Release to Deliver Unprecedented Transient Modeling Capabilities for Better Decision-Making Broomfiel…
June 16
Aren Matta added a discussion
Hello All   I was wondering if any of you have worked on CSO control alternatives as the city i reside is looking for alternatives assessment.   Some of the alternatives we have are :     Satellite Treatment WWTP's (There has to be more than storage…
June 15
Robert E Dickinson added a blog post
The “Hockey Stick” evolution By andyrussellThis is a post that aims to go through the evolution of the “Hockey Stick” from 1990 to the present day. It naturally misses out parts of the story, which deserve far more analysis, simply to keep the post…
June 15

© 2010   Created by Robert E Dickinson.

Badges  |  Report An Issue | SWMM 5 Blog  |  Terms of Service